Self-exclusion

Honoring a self-exclusion enrollment without logging the floor

A person asked to be kept out. Here is what it takes to keep that promise without watching everyone else.

Rows of slot machines in a dimly lit casino hall
Photo by Erik Mclean on Unsplash

Self-exclusion starts with a person making a hard decision about themselves. They sign up with their state’s gaming regulator and ask to be barred. In Pennsylvania, for example, nobody can put another person on the list. The request has to come from the individual, who also chooses how long it lasts.

From that moment, the obligation sits with the property, and the stakes for the guest are real. In Pennsylvania, a self-excluded person who gambles anyway has any winnings confiscated and can be cited for criminal trespass.

A vulnerable person on one side and a legal consequence on the other is why the way a property identifies an enrolled guest matters as much as whether it does.

Four parts of keeping the promise

A list that is current. Enrollments start, extend and end. Pennsylvania’s one-year and five-year casino exclusions stay in effect until the person formally asks to be removed, which surprises people who assume the ban simply lapses. The list your operators compare against has to reflect every change on the day it happens, or the property will miss someone or stop someone it should not.

A check that is narrow. The duty is to recognize a known, enrolled person. It is not a reason to record everyone who walks in or to keep a gallery of lawful guests for later. VisualCasino compares a still your operator chose against the lists you are required or authorized to enforce, such as your self-exclusion file in X-LST. It never touches your video and keeps no footage.

A person who decides. A comparison returns a possible match. A trained member of your surveillance team decides whether it is the same person, and whether the enrollment is still current, before anyone approaches the guest.

A record you can show. Every view and every decision is logged in LOGiT. When your regulator asks what happened, you can show who looked, when, and what they decided.

Handle it like health information

For many people, enrolling is a health decision. Treat the record with the care you would give health information: the fewest people with access, no copies in email or group chats, and a log of every look. That is good practice wherever you operate, and it is the standard VisualCasino is built around.

Five questions for any self-exclusion technology

  1. Who is in the comparison set: enrolled people only, or everyone who comes through the door?
  2. Does the system keep video, or a gallery of guests who were not a match?
  3. Who decides that a possible match is the same person, and what do they check first?
  4. How quickly does a removal or an expiry reach the list your operators use?
  5. Can you show your regulator a complete record of every view and every decision?

See it in your own room.

A working session built around your property, your jurisdiction, and your regulator.

Source: Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board, Responsible Play: Self-Exclusion, https://responsibleplay.pa.gov/self-exclusion/